Political Correctness is not like a religion IT IS a religion. Complete with its own ruthless high priests constantly on the lookout for heretics to its dogma of ‘tolerance’ and ‘equality’.
But tolerance
also means to “endure”, ” to put up with” , “to suffer through” and they
are the accurate descriptions of the situation for white people
particularly in ultra PC anglosphere countries.
During a
football game in a round known hypocritically as the “indigenous round” a
specific favouring of race in itself, we see the extraordinary
spectacle of a fully grown 30 something man, a fit sports ‘star’ no less
in the supposed rough and tough world of football, apparently fall to
pieces over ‘name calling’ from a young 13 year old girl.
The
player pointed to her in the crowd and kicked off a unforgivable round
of events including security guards parading her through the crowd,
being interviewed by police who detained her for 2 hours without even
her mum, to AFL officials making an example of her and the media
spreading her name and picture far and wide.
He
later decided that such a deal shouldn’t be made of it, perhaps after
realising that a burly, well paid athlete making an example of a young
school girl could be received poorly by people, but by then it was too
late. A respected, highly-paid footballer, the powerful institution of
the AFL and the collective force of the mass media had unleashed a
witless, cowardly mob on a vulnerable little girl. The anti-racists
witch hunt has found a new target. A change from video footage of people
on public transport taken on mobile phones.
Compare the treatment of a similar aged girl from a country we love to bash for ‘human rights’, Communist China.
“Chinese Police Handcuff Teen Girl for Accidentally Spilling Drink on Government Car May 29 2013Two officials in China reportedly were suspended after allegedly handcuffing a teenage girl who spilled water on a government car and parading her around town.The story of the teens alleged mistreatment by officials went viral after photos of the handcuffed 13-year-old were posted on a Chinese micro-blogging site.According to the site, the girl accidentally splashed water on a government car in south-west China. The officials reportedly began arguing with the girl and she was subsequently handcuffed and forced to parade on the street for 20 minutes, according to the International Business Times.”
At least in the Chinese case, these officers were apparently suspended. Not here in Australia where they are lauded
This level of
harassment in the West of whites beggars belief that Australia or the
USA or UK are democracies, the increasing level of PC laws to stifle
dissent, surveillance and coercion by the state really proves that we
are not a democracy but only a liberal democracy. Read that as a LIBERAL
regime.
The crime this time? the young 13 year old Australian girl called him the name of an animal. In this case it wasn’t a goose -“ya goose you over tightened those bolts” or a turkey “you bloody turkey, didn’t you save that word doc before you shut your computer”
or cockroach, dog, pig but APE. Probably the most complex and
intelligent out of the animal names listed or any that one might be
called.
Aren’t all
humans at least from the evolutionary perspective APES? only evangelical
Christians say otherwise. Those dogmatic high priests of Political
Correct-ianity decreed to the world that we are all the SAME, we are all
EQUAL and that race is only a matter of skin colour. This is to be
believed as a truth, when it benefits the anti-white brigade, but when
it serves their purposes, racial differences become real.
Humanity is a
diverse species with many races, ethnicities and associated cultures-
this is a good thing. If according to the PC Priests we are ALL EQUAL
then why would any one particular race or group of people be more
insulted or afraid of a name than any other? I can say I have been
called white c##t, cracker, honkey, white devil numerous times and its
water off a ducks back, it even brings a smile because I am confident
with myself and quietly proud in my heritage as any race or ethnicity
should be. Here lies the paradox. Some anti-racists have pointed out
that the term ‘ape’ is derogatory to Aboriginals because of their
characteristics, yet at the same time, they argue that such differences
don’t exist.
Why does the
Liberal establishment go ‘ape’, as it were over this? It is perhaps
understandable for Goodes, and he has the right to think what he likes
and take offence when he wants, but why the rest? Why do they back him
up completely, rather than question whether his reaction, pointing out a
13 year old girl in front of thousands, was disproportionate? Are the
Politically Correct Liberals not racist in themselves, by suggesting
that Goodes, being Aboriginal has a greater claim to grievance over the
“ape” slur than a white person would have?
The way this
girl was treated was disproportionate. A 13 year old girl, using what on
the surface is a low grade insult, isn’t representing a threat to the
future of this country. Most people understand its commonplace to call
each other names, it’s part of the robust activity of human interaction
which includes giving people a good ribbing and receiving it. Many of us
have called someone who is relatively large and or a bit hairy an APE.
Heck every father is an APE to his young boys when he wrestles with
them, and that father may only be 70kg but that’s huge to a 3 year old.
This incident
has given the mainstream media, who are suffering from a slow decline
into obsolescence and diminishing sales, another “oh golly gosh, look at
this racism” episode to exploit. Liberal journalists are tripping over
each other to write about how latent ‘racism’ is still a huge problem,
about how a 13 year old girl at the football is an example of some
imaginary black stain that taints white history, and how we all must put
more effort to make sure there are no more racists. Yes, in an age
where an Aboriginal footballer, who most likely is getting paid rather
handsomely just for kicking a ball around, who can get a 13 year old
girl grilled by police without a lawyer for 2 hours by a simple point of
the finger, who has the media (and human rights commission, hate laws,
racial vilification laws etc.) behind him, we still have journalists
trying to impress upon us that Australia today is not really different
to the fictional “slave masters” of days gone by. If they truly cared
about Aboriginals, they would do more to help remote communities which
are plagued by alcoholism and social dysfunction as well as promote more
autonomy for Aboriginal people over their own affairs. If they truly
cared about Aboriginals, they would do more to help remote communities
which are plagued by alcoholism and social dysfunction. But that
wouldn’t serve any anti-white purpose. Far better to focus on someone
who is doing well, and get an anti-white, anti-Anglo Australia story out
of it. The reaction of the media seems to clearly show that they don’t
care so much about Goodes, but rather relish the opportunity to moralise
against whites.
A nefarious example is here, an article in The Age titled “Getting real about racism”i.
The author, Sam De Brito, who has a blog called “All men are liars”
(how Politically Correct!), criticises Australia for allowing this
“casual racism” to go unpunished. Taking the anti-racist, that is,
anti-white position, he writes some gems, such as this.
“I’ll take a guess at why your casual-Eddie-McGuire-type-racism persists in this country – because you don’t get killed for it and you certainly don’t get punished if you’re rich and white.”
and
I’m saying we need to get real about punishing it.
How does he want
to ‘get real’ about punishing a 13 year old girl exactly? But where he
really reveals the dark side of anti-racist mentality, is with
statements such as this.
This is not to say the standard result for using racial slurs in a country like the US is death – but baby, you pull an “ape” or “nigger” line out on the subway of your average US city, you’re odds-on to get a beating. You say it to the wrong person and you’re gonna get shot or stabbed or stomped into a cranial pizza.
and
Even the dumbest, most rusted-on American racist knows if you call a black person a nigger, you better bring it, because you’re gonna get a savage reaction, born of the hurt Adam Goodes articulated so well in his press conference this week.
The irony was
lost on him, but not one some of the commenter’s to this article. In an
article “against racism”, he very clearly suggests that black Americans
would quickly resort to illegal acts of violent crime and savagery. Not
only is he almost supporting such activity, he is unwittingly, or
perhaps wittingly, stereotyping black people as ones who would shoot,
stab or stomp someone who said something offensive. He is contrasting
this with (white) Australia, where people are more reasonable!
Anti-racism is anti-white, and if an anti-racist, such as De Brito
actually make racist comments against blacks in order to be anti-white,
then according to the Politically Correct hierarchy, it is permissible.
Racism is permitted in all forms, if it is ultimately to criticise
whites. Call an Aboriginal an ape or suggest they play the part of King
Kong, its police and loss of job for you. Say that blacks would shoot
and stop you, but do it to be “anti-white”, you get paid.
We would caution
a simpleton like De Brito on immature hints at violence. It’s almost as
if he thinks his argument, indeed any position, is stronger when it
could possibly be backed up with real violence on the street. Well, De
Brito, anyone can harness, organise and arrange ‘violence, everybody
always has a bigger stronger brother, a MMA friend that could avenge one
act of violence with another, and so on and so forth. What if De Brito
had to cover a story whereby in this fictional example Samoans were were
allegedly harassing some Chinese. Samoans are well known to be
generally larger on average physically than Chinese who are generally
smaller, how would his argument flow in this example? would he argue
that Samoans should not be worried about street level beatings from
Chinese individuals, but warn Samoa that the Chinese collectively are
tougher and can ‘bring it’ in the form of military superiority that
could stomp the island of Samoa into a pizza? Back off on your threats
of violence against whites.
Compare this
media created race ‘furore’ over the animal name calling to a recently
unlikely media ‘ star’ Charles Ramsay. He is a African American man who
made the comment at the end of one interview.
“Bro, I
knew something was wrong when a little pretty white girl ran into a
black man’s arms,” he said. “Something is wrong here. Dead give away.
Dead giveaway. Deeeeeeeeeeaaaaaad giveaway. Either she’s homeless, or
she’s got problems. That’s the only reason she’d run to a black man.”
Where is the
chorus condemning that much more explicit comment? oh you say he rescued
somebody, fine, but if a white rescuer tacked such words onto any
interview we wouldn’t hear the end of it. It would overshadow the good
deed.
We defend the right of Mr Ramsay or the young girl to speak their minds, our freedoms do not end where your feelings start.
Maybe we should next move to pickup those ‘racists’ in National
Gorilla Suit Day. Look at those white hands sticking out of the suits,
they say it’s just for fun but we know they’re really doing it to get at
black people.
Then there is Black Face, apparently a horrible act hurtful to black people.
Liberals
abroad and a few locally attempted to create hysteria over the 2009
episode of Australian comedy show Hey Hey its Saturday on which some
contestants blacked up as the Jackson five.Then liberals again created a stir in a tea pot about some young Aussie boys who have dressed up as the “The Voice” TV show judges, originally Delta Goodrem (one of the judges imitated) participated via Twitter as any of us would congratulating them on their humour then backtracked.
Why can liberals not explain satisfactorily the hypocrisy of WhiteFace?
Never mind small random skits on a TV show or fleeting tweets on Twitter, the below two African actors played white females in a 2004 Hollywood movie called White Chicks that will forever be available for consumption in bricks and mortar stores.
The fact is, there is no hysteria, the Australian media like all
Western countries is mostly a closed shop owned by a small number of
interests and operates on a blatant liberal bias. It’s important to
separate your thoughts and impressions from the large power projection
into our living rooms, cars and lunch room tables the controlled media
has via TV, radio, newspapers and magazines.Forget, Eddy McGuire, Darryl Summers and Delta Goodrem they are selfish plastic celebrities whose public backtracking just provides a double bonus to the systems attempt at defining our taboos and engineering our responses. But we wouldn’t expect anything else from weak individuals who depend on their ‘media profile’ for monetary gain.
You and I, our workmates, fathers, mothers, neighbours, family and the vast majority of society do not share their views, we instead are outraged at the we are being socially engineered, coerced and harassed into changing our values, traditions and principles. These little Stalin’s will fail, to notice difference, to joke and jest and receive it in return is to be human and artificial repression of our humanity will be ultimately unsuccessful.
This case and the lurking spectre of ‘Anti Racism’ a PC commandment only serves to illustrate that yet again ANTI RACISM is a Codeword for ANTI WHITE.
